Humanism-Oriented Research on Misapplication Pitfalls and Optimizing Strategies of Four Core Foreign Language Teaching Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/jedss.v1n3.03Keywords:
Humanism, Foreign language teaching approaches, Second language acquisition, Core competenciesAbstract
In line with the healthy school development requirements of the 15th Five-Year Plan and the core competency goals of English education, this paper addresses the typical problems in China’s basic foreign language teaching, including behaviorist dominance, neglected student affective needs, and prevalent second language acquisition anxiety. Based on Maslow’s self-actualization theory and Rogers’ humanistic educational theory, this study focuses on four classic humanistic teaching approaches: Community Language Learning, the Natural Approach, Total Physical Response, and Suggestopedia. It explores how the four methods relieve learning anxiety and promote autonomous learning via community interaction, authentic contexts, multi-sensory experience and psychological suggestion. This paper further summarizes four common classroom application misconceptions, namely superficial educational concepts, misplaced classroom subjects, unitary evaluation systems and homogenized teaching design, which are mainly caused by long-term exam-oriented teaching and behaviorist paradigms. Adhering to the humanistic concepts of affective priority, individual difference respect and holistic development, the paper proposes systematic optimization strategies from four aspects: renewing teaching concepts, improving classroom practice, constructing diversified evaluation systems, and implementing graded teaching design.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhou, H. Y., & Li, Y. Y. (n.d.). Several policy suggestions for the high-quality implementation of the "15-19" education plan. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). Retrieved July 7, 2026.
[2] Zhong, L. B. (2022). Exploring college English course teaching from the perspective of humanism. Teaching and Learning Forum, 22, 45–48.
[3] Dai, J. X. (2001). A review of humanistic teaching method. Foreign Language Teaching Studies, 2, 17–21.
[4] Liu, R. Q. (2019). Western linguistic schools. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[5] Wang, Q. (2021). English teaching methodology course. Higher Education Press.
[6] Maslow, A. (2021). Motivation and personality. Unity Publishing House.
[7] Rogers, C., & Freyberg, J. (2015). Self-directed learning (3rd ed.). People's Publishing House.
[8] Ma, Y. X. (2019). Exploration of the teaching strategy of community language learning (CLL) in the context of university English teaching reform. Journal of Changchun Normal University, 38(1), 176–178, 186.
[9] He, M. L. (2015). TPR is an effective teaching method for primary school English. Chinese Journal of Education, 9, 103.
[10] Apelt, W. (1982). Suggestology and outlines of suggestopedy – Lozanov, G. SYSTEM, 10(2), 194–197.
[11] Yuan, Y. (2022). A review of research on the application of suggestopedia method in the past decade. Journal of Nanjing Open University, 1, 73–78.
[12] Huang, C. L. (2018). English education should emphasize the integration of humanism. Industry and Science & Technology Forum, 17(3), 152–153.
[13] Gu, S. (2012). Natural teaching method and its application in listening teaching guidance. Xueyuan (Educational Research), 23, 85, 88.
[14] Li, C. C. (2021). Research on second language acquisition from the perspective of positive psychology: Review and prospect (2012–2021). Foreign Language Teaching, 42(4), 57–63.
[15] Qin, X. B. (2008). Adhering to the humanistic teaching philosophy and fully implementing the "Teaching Requirements for College English Courses" – Also discussing the compilation concept of the "New Century College English Series Textbooks" "Integrated Course". Foreign Language Media Education, 3, 3–7.
[16] Zhou, X. (2001). Humanistic thought in modern foreign language teaching abroad. Foreign Languages and Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 34–36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Educational Development and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







