The Mechanisms of Value Identification and Emotional Belonging in the Work Effectiveness of Highly Qualified Specialists: A Mediated Model from Chinese Enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/jedss.v1n2.02Keywords:
Value identification, Emotional belonging, Work effectiveness, Highly qualified specialists, Mediation, Chinese enterprisesAbstract
In the knowledge-intensive workplace, the psychological bonds between highly qualified specialists (HQS) and their organizations have emerged as critical determinants of work effectiveness. However, the distinct roles of value identification and emotional belonging remain theoretically undifferentiated and empirically underexplored. Drawing on social exchange theory and self-determination theory, this study constructs a theoretical model examining the relationships among value identification, emotional belonging, and work effectiveness of HQS in Chinese enterprises. Using survey data from 562 highly qualified specialists, structural equation modeling and bootstrapping mediation analyses were employed. The results indicate that both value identification (β = 0.275, p < 0.001) and emotional belonging (β = 0.258, p < 0.001) are significantly and positively associated with work effectiveness. Moreover, emotional belonging partially mediates the relationship between value identification and work effectiveness (indirect effect = 0.087, 95% CI [0.063, 0.115]). The study also identifies organizational culture, management systems, and leadership style as key antecedents of value identification. These findings provide a differentiated understanding of cognitive and affective attachment mechanisms and offer practical guidance for cultivating value-congruent, emotionally supportive organizational environments for HQS.
Downloads
References
[1] Drucker, P. F. (1959). Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New "Post-Modern" World. Harper & Row.
[2] Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Sage Publications.
[3] Davenport, T. H. (2002). Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers. Harvard Business School Press.
[4] Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
[5] Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
[6] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
[7] Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
[8] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
[9] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Educational Development and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







